|
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ e.g. `2.0.1`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specifically, the above means:
|
|
|
|
|
|
-1. Admitting non-breaking-API changes before Week 3 in the beta cycle is okay, even if those changes have the potential to cause moderate side-affects
|
|
|
+1. Admitting non-breaking-API changes before Week 3 in the beta cycle is okay, even if those changes have the potential to cause moderate side-effects
|
|
|
2. Admitting feature-flagged changes, that do not otherwise alter existing code paths, at most points in the beta cycle is okay. Users can explicitly enable those flags in their apps.
|
|
|
3. Admitting features of any sort after Week 3 in the beta cycle is 👎 without a very good reason.
|
|
|
|
|
@@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ We seek to increase clarity at all levels of the update and releases process. St
|
|
|
* Commits that would result in a semver **minor** bump must start with `feat:`.
|
|
|
* Commits that would result in a semver **patch** bump must start with `fix:`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
-* We allow squashing of commits, provided that the squashed message adheres the the above message format.
|
|
|
+* We allow squashing of commits, provided that the squashed message adheres to the above message format.
|
|
|
* It is acceptable for some commits in a pull request to not include a semantic prefix, as long as the pull request title contains a meaningful encompassing semantic message.
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Versioned `master`
|